The real myths surrounding Royalty Free Photos
Free photographs anyone? Is there anything that is entirely free on the Internet? You might ask. There are some things that don't seem to cost as much as they should and one of these things are royalty-free photographs. For a small fee, the right to use an image forever can be acquired. So easy it feels like a fraud. Well, maybe it is but the right to use an image doesn't confer ownership or copyright of any sort. I bet you didn't know this before now.
The need to project amazing visuals on websites and social media pages mean that a lot of people see royalty free images as the easiest way to obtain quality photographs without paying for the full package. These websites are mostly non-commercial meaning that while the page isn't making any income from a photograph that cost money to acquire a partial right to use
Understanding the concept of image licensing is key to understanding the real myths surrounding royalty free photographs. I could create an image and sell it multiple times without losing the copyright and repeat the process over and over again. Does it sound like a scam artist at work right? I might just be one.
Stock agencies sell these licenses that confer the right to use the photographs but they're not selling the image itself. How strange? Is it possible to buy an item without owning it? Well, these photos say it is and there could be hundreds of people buying a license to use the same image at the same time Isn't this crazy? What happened to wait for your turn on the queue?
Thinking you own an image simply because you paid a small fee to use it is quite ridiculous and when you consider that you can't use the image acquired for any commercial purposes, the real myths begin to unravel. Paying money to someone for partial rights to use an image that cannot be used to generate income must rank as one of the most painful things on earth.
Moreover, using these images requires you to attribute the source so all the while the author gets more traffic for their business and can continue selling the image rights without much ado. Royalty free photos are not what they sound like at all The photographer and the stock agency often split the profits from the license sales and everybody wins except the guy who paid of course.
There are a lot of stock agencies selling such images but it is more popular in the microstock agency where photographs are cheap and easy to acquire. The ability to license the same image multiple times remains the real myth of royalty-free photographs because such privileges do not occur in other industries that where royalties apply. Maybe selling licenses is the next goldmine.